Hoagland v. Schnorr

17 Ohio St. (N.S.) 31

Opinion

By the Court:

The undertaking was not in time. The judgmenl must be held to have been rendered on the day of trial, as there appears to have been no continuance entered. The recitals of the undertaking are no evidence of the date of the judgment. The transcript alone must be looked to for that. We see no error in the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.