Hoag v. Landau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoag v. Landau

231 A.D. 776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 776 (Hoag v. Landau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoag v. Landau, 231 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground there were prejudicial errors in the ruling of the court, and that the verdict as to malice and probable cause is against [777]*777the weight of the evidence. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Hill, JJ., concur; Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground there were prejudicial errors in the ruling of the court, and that the verdict as to malice and probable cause is against [777]*777the weight of the evidence. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Hill, JJ., concur; Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoag-v-landau-nyappdiv-1930.