Hoag v. Hoag
664 A.2d 1354, 541 Pa. 621, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 935
Opinion
ORDER
The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
ZAPPALA and CASTILLE, JJ., and MONTEMURO, Senior Justice, who is sitting by designation, would reverse the order of the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoag v. Hoag, 664 A.2d 1354, 541 Pa. 621, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 935 (Pa. 1995).
664 A.2d 1354 (Hoag v. Hoag) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diament v. Diament
816 A.2d 256 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Thomas v. Trento
744 A.2d 774 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
McClung v. Breneman
700 A.2d 495 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Leister v. Leister
684 A.2d 192 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)