Hoag v. Hoag

664 A.2d 1354, 541 Pa. 621, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 935
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 11, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 664 A.2d 1354 (Hoag v. Hoag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoag v. Hoag, 664 A.2d 1354, 541 Pa. 621, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 935 (Pa. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

ZAPPALA and CASTILLE, JJ., and MONTEMURO, Senior Justice, who is sitting by designation, would reverse the order of the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diament v. Diament
816 A.2d 256 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Thomas v. Trento
744 A.2d 774 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
McClung v. Breneman
700 A.2d 495 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Leister v. Leister
684 A.2d 192 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 A.2d 1354, 541 Pa. 621, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoag-v-hoag-pa-1995.