Ho v. Rubin
756 A.2d 633, 333 N.J. Super. 580, 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 336
This text of 756 A.2d 633 (Ho v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ho v. Rubin, 756 A.2d 633, 333 N.J. Super. 580, 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 336 (N.J. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Plaintiffs Evelyn T. Ho, guardian of Maria Ho an incompetent, and Maria Ho, individually, appeal the entry of an order for summary judgment entered on May 26, 1999 dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint on the basis of N.J.S.A. 40A:14-157.
[581]*581We affirm substantially lor the reasons given by Judge Simon in her comprehensive written opinion of May 26,1999.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R by MCM Capital Partners v. Tracey M. Brown
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2022
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
756 A.2d 633, 333 N.J. Super. 580, 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ho-v-rubin-njsuperctappdiv-2000.