Ho v. Rubin
756 A.2d 633, 333 N.J. Super. 580, 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ho v. Rubin. Read the opinion of the Court — 333 N.J. Super. 599 →
Opinion
Plaintiffs Evelyn T. Ho, guardian of Maria Ho an incompetent, and Maria Ho, individually, appeal the entry of an order for summary judgment entered on May 26, 1999 dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint on the basis of N.J.S.A. 40A:14-157.
[581]*581We affirm substantially lor the reasons given by Judge Simon in her comprehensive written opinion of May 26,1999.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ho v. Rubin, 756 A.2d 633, 333 N.J. Super. 580, 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 336 (N.J. Ct. App. 2000).
756 A.2d 633 (Ho v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R by MCM Capital Partners v. Tracey M. Brown
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2022