Ho v. Ho

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ho v. Ho

362 S.W.3d 71, 2012 WL 1034213, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 423

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketWD 73218

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 71 (Ho v. Ho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ho v. Ho, 362 S.W.3d 71, 2012 WL 1034213, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 423 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dong Ho (“Husband”) appeals a Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, which dissolved his marriage to Alisa N.H. Ho (“Wife”). Husband asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding Wife a disproportionate share of the couple’s marital property. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dong Ho (“Husband”) appeals a Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, which dissolved his marriage to Alisa N.H. Ho (“Wife”). Husband asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding Wife a disproportionate share of the couple’s marital property. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 S.W.3d 71, 2012 WL 1034213, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ho-v-ho-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack