Ho, Allen

Opinion

is%*L £> Cour + OF APPcal5 /^P3#f3 -FiF+h District of Tcx^S 4+ DaD^i ORiGINAL n/6.o5-n-oo^2-cie.

/si Q. 05- H- Q0 *?U>3 - CX RECEIVED IN_ On Of Peal from he, Criminal Di^iMffcaT D^lloii county, te.x«^ kov oe 2015 Trial (SDuft dafe, no^. Fi3-5tfMZ-J\ fissswcr.

««., 1i (t3ards -*M Oral ar^urne.nf.I'r will htlp a\dmtL io avtn the cafe in more dtfai) review. hx&\k\<&on +h£ busts /?<- muffiatn+ toidenct.Md, counsel.

ite nature of McrrsH^sm^hcW^md^^^ or \uifu\ab)t. <—«WEALS " M-T-/ 09 ?n^

^aJL x r "^f^-OFFenStJ. im frlal Court rtnder^d JUd^nncni Sylrcnana for men Wo fo fif^c&nJde^uS

S>\ a\rrf\a\f for \Y)t yrounds of ftevi&A/ X. Point of trror,zn&ufficitni +haf d-efendani htitn Ho had.

Possession or am Cin0*rPrinkS yikl Found on cu deadly Wtafofl. zEXXn Ptonttfe/ror.TnSufficitnlr evidence +haf dtftnd*n\ Allen ffo^ Firtf«rfr,7)ts ia/«? l/fteiaf ^e 1l%1 &*£& LSrMt.

Point of frror, ThtidtnVte oh-ite difendan* /HI*. U yaS m\ d&trm\Md through a Phoh line-up from ^ rKZT Point of error, denied efFccf'n/e. aSSiSYa.nCd a<f HoanS&l Pai ltd Yd Prefer La advi&t PtYiYiones AlUn Hd £i -to how -tf^ I^ia/ aflPK'^ to th£ fa^fcc of 4-K& Las~e. T7~T Joint of-error, denied eff-ecfive, Motion Yo AiS>miS<5 h(X Yrlal Counsel.

"VTT . Poin-f of-error, Y\\i Yrial Couft treed in f^dirS Yb admonish appellant's PurSuanY Yo Yne.mandabfy r/*ui cements ofhctiCit %l*.\s T-OcaJ Code of e.r>fr\,fial P(ocedure. LFarena. v. UI; ferni*.3 _ Le>nCi£>€, ItrSJumenf j£ rtBacdS Yo CaSe, Hd. F\3'3&D^-J and. f13-58042.-J <Yht Pacts oPVnt CaJt viecc nof Presented in Substantial Yorrn. ihejj wire liven to Ym Jury as Yn^\Dus /w' A\<nfh*? r aa\hounY±itvYhe, (tPPtlantx doPerSe. ^ \mLflLT^J^ d'd ?f ^ *^d,ents flffh diShicY af TlxloS ballad

31 now Com& before th^ tourV asking for ac\M rt\\tf hc^d'mm^ thil reA/i£k).

Alio Pr^i/j for JhU re,\/iejj^) ^ b-e^ 3x<xn\etL and further Jul {ice. is Served..

hank Mb{L for CoftSidt/cxiiDin

kPPt\\an\. rfDri)

JI alio a^K ?or a(\\A Cof\ts be Porfc^ed d^c \ov\Q acceJ& of pnA-W c%^a\ \cdolt, \v> m^

OibfoHn TCPd/?)

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2015.

In The

Court of gppeafe

jfiffy Btetrtct of Gfexaa at ©alias;

No. 05-14-00962-CR No. 05-14-00963-CR

ALLEN HO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-58092-J, F13-58094-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Fillmore

A jury convicted Allen Ho of two aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses.

The trial court rendered judgment sentencing Ho to fifteen years' imprisonment in each case.

See TEX. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). On appeal, Ho's attorney filed a brief in

which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy ofthe brief to Ho. We advised Ho ofhis right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

(identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find

nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court's judgments.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47

140962F.U05

Court of Appeals

Jftftl) JBtetrtct of tKexasi at ©alia*

JUDGMENT

ALLEN HO, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

No. 05-14-00962-CR V. F13-58092-J).

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Evans participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 28, 2015.

Court of Appeals

jftftib ©fsJtrtct of Wtxas at 3©alla*

JUDGMENT

ALLEN HO, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

No. 05-14-00963-CR V. F13-58094-J).

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Evans participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 28, 2015.

[jtOMMSyg'- AMARILLO TX791 26 OCT 2015 PM 2 L ,r, ,r.:r5 ^^r^^Jfjirl

sy-3?1.'"'

5fU'.A>/i«>> Tx 7-^0"?2- ^ L.ta(x\y mai L ;5'T|C>V,v-4*'4.!rri ?iB

,rt«rfiwAf:.--

Pif+K DiiK'tt oP T^XftJ «T D*iUi \0O Co^r^^tO Sk'V^^S^H XL D^Uo-J.'fcAAi '7 5 2 02. :'S»2l_tj£-fi+CS!=i3 >MiilillMlliii'l""ii"l"lliil.iii'l'lii'li"»'iiiiil'illli'