Hnarakis v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Hnarakis v. United States

204 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2006·No. No. 06-1478·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gus Hnarakis appeals the district court’s order substituting the United States as the Defendant and dismissing Hnarakis’s action for return of property, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hnarakis v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-00557-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gus Hnarakis appeals the district court’s order substituting the United States as the Defendant and dismissing Hnarakis’s action for return of property, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hnarakis v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-00557-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hnarakis v. United States, 204 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

204 F. App'x 181 (Hnarakis v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.