H.M.P. v. C.S.V.

Missouri Court of Appeals

H.M.P. v. C.S.V.

541 S.W.3d 616

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2017·No. No. ED 105012·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The respondent-petitioner ("H.M.P.") requested a full order of protection against appellant-respondent ("C.S.V.") based on abuse by harassment under § 455.010. The trial court entered a judgment granting a full order of protection to H.M.P. Finding there is sufficient evidence to support this judgment, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The respondent-petitioner ("H.M.P.") requested a full order of protection against appellant-respondent ("C.S.V.") based on abuse by harassment under § 455.010. The trial court entered a judgment granting a full order of protection to H.M.P. Finding there is sufficient evidence to support this judgment, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

H.M.P. v. C.S.V., 541 S.W.3d 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

541 S.W.3d 616 (H.M.P. v. C.S.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.