H.M.P. v. C.S.V.

Missouri Court of Appeals

H.M.P. v. C.S.V.

541 S.W.3d 616

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 12, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105012

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 616 (H.M.P. v. C.S.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

H.M.P. v. C.S.V., 541 S.W.3d 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The respondent-petitioner ("H.M.P.") requested a full order of protection against appellant-respondent ("C.S.V.") based on abuse by harassment under § 455.010. The trial court entered a judgment granting a full order of protection to H.M.P. Finding there is sufficient evidence to support this judgment, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The respondent-petitioner ("H.M.P.") requested a full order of protection against appellant-respondent ("C.S.V.") based on abuse by harassment under § 455.010. The trial court entered a judgment granting a full order of protection to H.M.P. Finding there is sufficient evidence to support this judgment, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hmp-v-csv-moctapp-2017.