HML Holdings, LLC v. Romeros LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 9, 2022·No. 3:21-cv-00380·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HML HOLDINGS, LLC Case No. 21-cv-0380-BAS-BLM

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 29)

14 TAMARA ROMERO, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 Before this Court is the Stipulation of Dismissal jointly filed by the parties on March 18 7, 2022, wherein the parties indicate that they agree to dismiss this action with prejudice 19 and with each party bearing its own costs. (ECF No. 29.) 20 Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its 21 action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer 22 or moved for summary judgment, or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all 23 parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San 24 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a 25 compliant notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is 26 required. Stone v. Woodford, No. CIV-F-05-845 AWI-DLB, 2007 WL 527766 (E.D. Cal. 27 Feb. 16, 2007). A dismissal is without prejudice unless the parties stipulate otherwise. 28 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). However, the local civil rules of this district require that where, 1 |/as here, litigants seek voluntary dismissal by filing a signed stipulation pursuant to Rule 2 ||41(a)(1)(A)(ii), such a stipulation must be filed as a joint motion.! 3 Having considered the parties’ request, the Court construes the parties’ stipulation 4 a Joint Motion to dismiss this action and GRANTS that Joint Motion. (ECF No. 29.) 5 || Thus, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the action. Each party shall bear its 6 costs and fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. / , 8 || DATED: March 9, 2022 Lin A (Ayphan 6 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ‘orthe coo Electronic Case Ping Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HML Holdings, LLC v. Romeros LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

HML Holdings, LLC v. Romeros LLC (HML Holdings, LLC v. Romeros LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)