H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.

278 A.D.2d 367, 718 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13192

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated February 28, 2000, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change the venue of the action from the Supreme Court, Kings County, to the Supreme Court, Queens County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion to change the venue of the action pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) [368]*368(see, Miszko v Leeds & Morelli, 269 AD2d 372; Schlegel v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 258 AD2d 576; Mallory v Long Is. R. R., 245 AD2d 493). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc., 278 A.D.2d 367, 718 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 367 (H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mallory v. Long Island Rail Road
245 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Miszko v. Leeds & Morelli
269 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)