HLAVATY v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

HLAVATY v. City of St. Louis

238 S.W.3d 698, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2007 WL 2832524

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 2007·No. ED 88838·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Hlavaty appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the City of St. Louis on her claims for personal injuries. We find that, even to the extent the trial court erred in admitting testimony of prior accidents, the error was not prejudicial. We further find that the trial court did not err in refusing to allow Hlavaty to inquire into subsequent remedial measures on re-direct examination of her expert witness.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Hlavaty appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the City of St. Louis on her claims for personal injuries. We find that, even to the extent the trial court erred in admitting testimony of prior accidents, the error was not prejudicial. We further find that the trial court did not err in refusing to allow Hlavaty to inquire into subsequent remedial measures on re-direct examination of her expert witness.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

HLAVATY v. City of St. Louis, 238 S.W.3d 698, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2007 WL 2832524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

238 S.W.3d 698 (HLAVATY v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.