H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County and John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County

Eleventh Circuit

H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County and John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County

998 F.2d 892, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21601, 1993 WL 300572

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 9, 1993·No. 90-5678·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The parties joint motion to withdraw the petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en bane, to vacate panel opinion and to remand based on settlement agreement is GRANTED. The panel opinion, published at 975 F.2d 762 (11th Cir.1992) is VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the ease is REMANDED to the district court with instructions that the ease be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

The parties joint motion to withdraw the petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en bane, to vacate panel opinion and to remand based on settlement agreement is GRANTED. The panel opinion, published at 975 F.2d 762 (11th Cir.1992) is VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the ease is REMANDED to the district court with instructions that the ease be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County and John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County, 998 F.2d 892, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21601, 1993 WL 300572 (11th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

998 F.2d 892 (H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County and John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related