Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hizbullahankhamon v. Coughlin

Hizbullahankhamon v. Coughlin

216 A.D.2d 869, 628 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7177
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1995·Published

Opinions

Determination annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: The determination finding petitioner guilty of violating inmate rule 117.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [18] [i]) must be annulled. That rule prohibits inmates from possessing "explosive devices or materials that can be used to make explosive devices”. Notes, drawings and diagrams regarding the instruction and assembly of pipe bombs, hot pot bombs, and booby traps were found in petitioner’s cell. Those documents do not constitute "explosive devices” or materials that can be used to make them within the meaning of rule 117.10; if documents are intended to come within its ambit, the rule should be amended accordingly.

All concur except Wesley and Balio, JJ., who dissent and vote to confirm in the following Memorandum:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hizbullahankhamon v. Coughlin, 216 A.D.2d 869, 628 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 869 (Hizbullahankhamon v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arteaga v. State of New York
527 N.E.2d 1194 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Blake v. Mann
551 N.E.2d 89 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Blake v. Mann
145 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Brown v. Coughlin
165 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Allah v. Coughlin
190 A.D.2d 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Mabry v. Coughlin
191 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)