Hixon v. State
This text of 113 S.W.2d 1236 (Hixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
■ Appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment [1237]*1237assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of ten years.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Hence, the only matter presented, for review is the sufficiency of the indictment to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.
An examination of the indictment discloses that it is in due form and sufficient.
No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined, by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and ap-nroved bv the court *
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.W.2d 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hixon-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.