Hix v. Stanchfield
This text of 238 P.2d 200 (Hix v. Stanchfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Alter did not' participate in the consideration of this cause.
Mr. Chief Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Knauss are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Justice Holland, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Clark think that it should be reversed.
The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no [423]*423good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f),.R.C.P. Colo.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 P.2d 200, 124 Colo. 422, 1951 Colo. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hix-v-stanchfield-colo-1951.