Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hix v. Deegan

Hix v. Deegan

274 A.D. 769, 80 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 17, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 274 A.D. 769 (Hix v. Deegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hix v. Deegan, 274 A.D. 769, 80 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, on the authority o£ Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc. (295 N. Y. 922) and Surace v. Pfaudler Co. (295 N. Y. 923) with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 822.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
68 N.E.2d 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Surace v. Pfaudler Company
68 N.E.2d 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 769, 80 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hix-v-deegan-nyappdiv-1948.