Hix v. Deegan
274 A.D. 769, 80 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, on the authority o£ Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc. (295 N. Y. 922) and Surace v. Pfaudler Co. (295 N. Y. 923) with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 822.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hix v. Deegan, 274 A.D. 769, 80 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
274 A.D. 769 (Hix v. Deegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
68 N.E.2d 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Surace v. Pfaudler Company
68 N.E.2d 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)