Hittleman Goldenrod Brewery, Inc. v. Ackley
This text of 246 A.D. 628 (Hittleman Goldenrod Brewery, Inc. v. Ackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for an examination before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There is disparity in the figures in the' pleadings of the parties in respect to the amount representing sales and credits. We think the examination sought by plaintiff, with the books and documents of the defendants produced on such examination, would aid in facilitating the trial; and that, therefore the examination may be deemed necessary. Examination may proceed on five days’ notice, at a time and place to be stated in the order. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hittleman-goldenrod-brewery-inc-v-ackley-nyappdiv-1935.