Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hitt v. State

Hitt v. State

31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 2010·No. 1D09-5983·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Lacayo, 8 So.3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that section 948.30(3), Florida Statutes, requiring a probationer who is designated a sexual predator to be subjected to electronic monitoring was not limited to probation imposed for sexual offenses).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hitt v. State, 31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

31 So. 3d 841 (Hitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lacayo
8 So. 3d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)