Hitt v. State
31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162
This text of 31 So. 3d 841 (Hitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hitt v. State, 31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See State v. Lacayo, 8 So.3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that section 948.30(3), Florida Statutes, requiring a probationer who is designated a sexual predator to be subjected to electronic monitoring was not limited to probation imposed for sexual offenses).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Lacayo
8 So. 3d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitt-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.