Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Hitt v. Roden

Hitt v. Roden

122 So. 3d 838, 2013 WL 765596, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 50
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 1, 2013
Docket2110061
StatusPublished

This text of 122 So. 3d 838 (Hitt v. Roden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hitt v. Roden, 122 So. 3d 838, 2013 WL 765596, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 50 (Ala. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinions

On Application for Rehearing

MOORE, Judge.

APPLICATION GRANTED; OPINION OF DECEMBER 21, 2012, WITHDRAWN; AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Spradlin v. Spradlin, 601 So.2d 76, 79 (Ala.1992); and Empiregas, Inc. of Ardmore v. Hardy, 487 So.2d 244, 251 (Ala.1985).

PITTMAN, THOMAS, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur. THOMPSON, P.J., dissents, with writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spradlin v. Spradlin
601 So. 2d 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1992)
Empiregas, Inc. of Ardmore v. Hardy
487 So. 2d 244 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Blasdel v. Blasdel
65 So. 3d 428 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 3d 838, 2013 WL 765596, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitt-v-roden-alacivapp-2013.