Hitner v. Suckley
This text of 12 F. Cas. 249 (Hitner v. Suckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If a judgment at law bp obtained by one person against another, and an injunction be applied for, the court will consider a service of the subpoena upon the attorney of the plaintiff at law, to be sufficient, if his client live out of the state. But the action at law by the defendant against the complainant, for slandering his title, la totally unconnected with the subject of controversy presented by this bill; and the court cannot consider the defendant’s attorney in that action, as representing him in this case. The motion for the injunction was with[250]*250drawn, on the counsel for the defendant promising to advise his client not to commit waste;.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F. Cas. 249, 2 Wash. C. C. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitner-v-suckley-circtdpa-1810.