Hite v. Webster Groves High School

161 F. App'x 618
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2006
Docket04-4204
StatusUnpublished

This text of 161 F. App'x 618 (Hite v. Webster Groves High School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hite v. Webster Groves High School, 161 F. App'x 618 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Hite appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination and retaliation suit. We dismiss the appeal as untimely, because Hite failed to file his notice of appeal within thirty days after the district court entered its judgment, as required under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1), or to move timely, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5), for an extension of time to appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 26(b)(1) (court may not extend time to file notice of appeal except as authorized by Rule 4).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, see Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa, 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (“A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional.”), and we deny as moot Hite’s motion for appellate counsel.

1

.. The Honorable Catherine D. Periy, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa
79 F.3d 701 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hite-v-webster-groves-high-school-ca8-2006.