Hite v. Harrison

Kentucky Supreme Court

Hite v. Harrison

1 Ky. 29

DecidedSeptember 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ky. 29 (Hite v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hite v. Harrison, 1 Ky. 29 (Ky. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The plaintiff, as assignee of David Williams, ought to have surveyed the settlement in a square form, the lines running to the cardinal points, and at equal distances from the improvement,, and the pre-emption also in a square form, on the west side of the settlement, beginning at the south-west corner and running to the cardinal point.

Judgment for the plaintiff, for the interference designated on the plat by the figures 12 3, which is twenty-six acres, and half costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The plaintiff, as assignee of David Williams, ought to have surveyed the settlement in a square form, the lines running to the cardinal points, and at equal distances from the improvement,, and the pre-emption also in a square form, on the west side of the settlement, beginning at the south-west corner and running to the cardinal point.

Judgment for the plaintiff, for the interference designated on the plat by the figures 12 3, which is twenty-six acres, and half costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ky. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hite-v-harrison-ky-1789.