Hitchcock v. Rhodes

42 N.J. Eq. 495
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided February 15, 1887·Published

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Objection is made to exceptions filed to the answer that they are not signed by counsel. The rules of this court are silent upon the subject and there is no decision upon it. The English practice requires such signature. Under such circumstances that practice is to be followed, there being no statutory provision nor any regulation to forbid. West v. Paige, 1 Stock. 203.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hitchcock v. Rhodes, 42 N.J. Eq. 495 (N.J. Ct. App. 1887).

42 N.J. Eq. 495 (Hitchcock v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughson v. Hughson
98 A. 449 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916)