Hitchcock v. Rhodes
42 N.J. Eq. 495
This text of 42 N.J. Eq. 495 (Hitchcock v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hitchcock v. Rhodes, 42 N.J. Eq. 495 (N.J. Ct. App. 1887).
Opinion
Objection is made to exceptions filed to the answer that they are not signed by counsel. The rules of this court are silent upon the subject and there is no decision upon it. The English practice requires such signature. Under such circumstances that practice is to be followed, there being no statutory provision nor any regulation to forbid. West v. Paige, 1 Stock. 203.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hughson v. Hughson
98 A. 449 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 N.J. Eq. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitchcock-v-rhodes-njch-1887.