Hitchcock v. Probate Judge

1 McGrath 923, 99 McGrath 128
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1894
DocketNo. 13954
StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 923 (Hitchcock v. Probate Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hitchcock v. Probate Judge, 1 McGrath 923, 99 McGrath 128 (Mich. 1894).

Opinion

To compel respondent to vacate an order setting aside an order disallowing & claim filed against an estate, and granting a rehearing.

Granted February 20, 1894, without costs.

The widow of decedent filed a claim based upon an ante-nuptial agreement which was disallowed by the probate judge, on the ground that the husband had by will given a legacy in lieu of the debt. The widow then filed her election to take under the statute and not under the will, and asked leave to file another claim and have the disallowanco -set aside, which was granted.

Held, (1) A judge of probate has no power to set aside his own adjudications and grant rehearings.

Corby vs. Judge of Probate, 96 M., 11 (414).

(2) An application for a mandamus in such cases is properly made to the Supreme Court where the circuit judge was, before talcing his seat upon the bench, one of the attorneys in the matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corby v. Probate Judge
1 McGrath 413 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 923, 99 McGrath 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitchcock-v-probate-judge-mich-1894.