Hitchcock v. Haight
7 Ill. 603
Opinion
The Opinion of the Court was delivered by
The plaintiffs in error ask for a rule on the defendant to join in error. The scire facias was served on the defendant two days after the return day. The service amounts to nothing. The writ had lost its vitality. Its.force was spent. The defendant is not before us.
The motion is denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hitchcock v. Haight, 7 Ill. 603 (Ill. 1845).
7 Ill. 603 (Hitchcock v. Haight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGuire v. Montvale Lumber Co.
131 S.E. 274 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.
183 N.C. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Hatch v. . R. R.
112 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)