Hitchcock v. Blackman

Michigan Supreme Court

Hitchcock v. Blackman

1 McGrath 1543, 47 McGrath 146

DecidedOctober 26, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1543 (Hitchcock v. Blackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hitchcock v. Blackman, 1 McGrath 1543, 47 McGrath 146 (Mich. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel payment of a sum claimed to be due relator as stenographer for the Circuit Court of that county.

Denied October 26, 1881.

Delator was appointed when the circuit was composed of Kalamazoo, Allegan and Yan Biiren counties, but afterwards Allegan was detached and the board of supervisors of Yan Burén, declined to pay its proportion of the salary which had been previously paid, but fixed the amount which should be paid by that county.

Held, that under the Act of 1871 the board was authorized to so fix the amount that should be paid for the service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel payment of a sum claimed to be due relator as stenographer for the Circuit Court of that county.

Denied October 26, 1881.

Delator was appointed when the circuit was composed of Kalamazoo, Allegan and Yan Biiren counties, but afterwards Allegan was detached and the board of supervisors of Yan Burén, declined to pay its proportion of the salary which had been previously paid, but fixed the amount which should be paid by that county.

Held, that under the Act of 1871 the board was authorized to so fix the amount that should be paid for the service.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1543, 47 McGrath 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hitchcock-v-blackman-mich-1881.