Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.

DecidedMay 16, 2002

Docket13-02-00141-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr. (Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-141-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION

AND JOE MORALES, Appellants,

v.

HONOFRE RODRIGUEZ, JR., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Yanez, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND JOE MORALES, attempted to perfect an appeal from a ruling made by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. C-1990-01-B. The clerk’s record was received on March 18, 2002, and a supplemental clerk’s record was received on April 19, 2002.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that no appealable order had been entered in this cause. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16^th day of May, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-141-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION

AND JOE MORALES, Appellants,

v.

HONOFRE RODRIGUEZ, JR., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Yanez, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND JOE MORALES, attempted to perfect an appeal from a ruling made by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. C-1990-01-B. The clerk’s record was received on March 18, 2002, and a supplemental clerk’s record was received on April 19, 2002.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that no appealable order had been entered in this cause. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16^th day of May, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hispanic-broadcasting-corporation-and-joe-morales--texapp-2002.