Hirtenstein v. Farrell
This text of 33 Misc. 807 (Hirtenstein v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned to the plaintiff by the fall of a dumbwaiter.
The appellant claims a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the verdict rendered by the jury is against the weight of evidence.
It is a close case, and the jury having determined in favor of the plaintiff after a fair submission of the question to the jury, we think we are not warranted, under the evidence, to disturb the verdict.
Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
Present: McCarthy and S'chttohman, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Misc. 807, 68 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirtenstein-v-farrell-nynyccityct-1901.