Hirten v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation

256 A.D.2d 410, 682 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13425

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, dated September 4, 1995, denying the petitioner’s application to requalify as a lifeguard, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated February 19, 1997, which upon granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding as untimely, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant proceeding as time-barred (see, CPLR 217; Matter of De Milio v Borghard, 55 NY2d 216; Matter of Loughlin v Ross, 208 AD2d 631). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirten v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 256 A.D.2d 410, 682 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 410 (Hirten v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Milio v. Borghard
433 N.E.2d 506 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Loughlin v. Ross
208 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)