Hirst v. Maag

13 Pa. Super. 4, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 16, 1900
DocketAppeal, No. 160
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Pa. Super. 4 (Hirst v. Maag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirst v. Maag, 13 Pa. Super. 4, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The plaintiff’s claim in this action is founded upon the Act of April 22, 1794, 8 Sm. L. 177, P. & L. Dig. 2204, under which he seeks to recover for certain wagers or bets he had made with the defendants upon the future rise and fall of the market price of divers stocks usually dealt in upon the public stock exchange.

The statement shows that the wagers or bets were never completed, and though the plaintiff paid to the defendants the sum of $165 in consideration of the wagers and for the better securing the payment thereof in the event of the same being lost by the plaintiff, they, the defendants, did not purchase or sell any stocks, or expend any part of the said money for the use or benefit of the plaintiff, and that neither party at any time intended to purchase, deliver, or sell any stocks or securities, and, further, that the defendants applied the said sum to their own use. The transaction, as it is set out in the plaintiff’s statement, is not such a game of address, or hazard, or other play as is contemplated by the act of 1794. Betting upon the fluctuation of the market quotations of stock may be extremely hazardous; but it has been held by the Supreme Court so often that it ought not to require reiteration, that dealing in stocks, even on margin, is not gambling: L. H. Taylor & Company’s Estate, 192 Pa. 304.

The assignments of error are not sustained and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutterly v. Fleshman
41 Pa. Super. 131 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Pa. Super. 4, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirst-v-maag-pasuperct-1900.