Hirshfeld v. McDonald
39 N.Y.S. 1125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 12, 1896
StatusPublished
This text of 39 N.Y.S. 1125 (Hirshfeld v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hirshfeld v. McDonald, 39 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Hirshfeld v. Fitzgerald and otilers (decided herewith), the order appealed from should he affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirshfeld-v-mcdonald-nyappdiv-1896.