Hirshberger v. Manhattan Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 955

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 955 (Hirshberger v. Manhattan Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirshberger v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 955 (superctny 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided unfavorably to them in Seebach v. Railroad Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 208, (argued this term.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seebach v. Metropolitan El. R.
18 N.Y.S. 208 (Superior Court of New York, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.Y.S. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirshberger-v-manhattan-ry-co-superctny-1892.