Hirsh v. Kaminski

282 A.D. 1009, 125 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5664

This text of 282 A.D. 1009 (Hirsh v. Kaminski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirsh v. Kaminski, 282 A.D. 1009, 125 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The plaintiff himself testified that the defendant had paid in full for the items delivered to the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff cannot succeed in this action to replevin those items inasmuch as title to them has passed to the defendant. The judgment appealed from dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint in this replevin action, of course, does not foreclose the plaintiff from pursuing his pending action for breach of contract. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in an action in replevin.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D. 1009, 125 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsh-v-kaminski-nyappdiv-1953.