Hirsh v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 251 A.D. 24 (Hirsh v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint states a sufficient cause of action at law though not in equity. Consequently, an answer having been interposed, the court should not have dismissed the complaint. (Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kraemer v. World Wide Trading Co., Inc., 195 id. 305.)
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 24, 295 N.Y.S. 522, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsh-v-central-hanover-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1937.