Hirsh v. Beard
86 N.E. 954, 200 Mass. 569, 1909 Mass. LEXIS 1049
This text of 86 N.E. 954 (Hirsh v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hirsh v. Beard, 86 N.E. 954, 200 Mass. 569, 1909 Mass. LEXIS 1049 (Mass. 1909).
Opinion
All the material questions raised in this case. are settled in Lane v. Holcomb, 182 Mass. 360. The fact that there was a declaration in set-off is immaterial. It was within the discretion of the court to allow or disallow the motion to amend the answer. And the order for judgment was correct.
■ Judgment affirmed with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leopold Morse Co. v. Jenkins
4 Mass. App. Div. 274 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1939)
DiRuscio v. Popoli
269 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Herschman v. Justices of the Municipal Court
220 Mass. 137 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Nelson v. J. H. Winchell & Co.
89 N.E. 180 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 N.E. 954, 200 Mass. 569, 1909 Mass. LEXIS 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsh-v-beard-mass-1909.