Hirsh Schofield, Incorporated v. . Gusmer

123 N.E. 869, 226 N.Y. 649, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1014
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirsh Schofield, Incorporated v. . Gusmer, 123 N.E. 869, 226 N.Y. 649, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1014 (N.Y. 1919).

123 N.E. 869 (Hirsh Schofield, Incorporated v. . Gusmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apollo Stationery Co. v. Pilmar
11 Misc. 2d 265 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)