Hirschmann v. Hirschmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hirschmann v. Hirschmann

41 A.2d 13, 136 N.J. Eq. 230

DecidedFebruary 5, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.2d 13 (Hirschmann v. Hirschmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirschmann v. Hirschmann, 41 A.2d 13, 136 N.J. Eq. 230 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, which is reported at 135 N. J. Eq. 23.

Appellant, in. her brief, discusses an item concerning household furniture. This item appears not to have been treated in the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor nor disposed of by the decree entered in the court below. However, the point was not incorporated in the petition of appeal as a ground for reversal and, therefore, is not subject to examination by this court. New Jersey B. L. and I. Co. v. Lord, 66 N. J. Eq. 344, 350; Munger v. Munger, 130 N. J. Eq. 279, 286.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Wells, Raeeekty, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, which is reported at 135 N. J. Eq. 23.

Appellant, in. her brief, discusses an item concerning household furniture. This item appears not to have been treated in the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor nor disposed of by the decree entered in the court below. However, the point was not incorporated in the petition of appeal as a ground for reversal and, therefore, is not subject to examination by this court. New Jersey B. L. and I. Co. v. Lord, 66 N. J. Eq. 344, 350; Munger v. Munger, 130 N. J. Eq. 279, 286.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Wells, Raeeekty, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.2d 13, 136 N.J. Eq. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschmann-v-hirschmann-nj-1945.