Hirschl v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.

42 F. 803, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2242
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa·Decided June 26, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MilleR, Justice.

A corporation is a citizen of the state under whose laws it is organized. For the purpose of suing and being sued, it may become a resident of each state in which it does business under state law. The rule, under the removal act of August 13, 1888, as to natural persons, is applicable to corporations. Wrhen a corporation of one state is sued in the courts of another state, a petition for removal by it is not sufficient unless it alleges, in addition to the usual averments as to citizenship, that it is a non-resident of the state in which it is sued. The motion to remand is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hirschl v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co., 42 F. 803, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2242 (circtsdia 1890).

42 F. 803 (Hirschl v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guarantee Co. of North America v. First National Bank of Lynchburg
28 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1898)