Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz
This text of 169 A.D. 957 (Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. (Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911.) The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore, the order-appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 A.D. 957, 153 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschkowitz-v-rosenkrantz-nyappdiv-1915.