Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.
This text of 315 So. 2d 17 (Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal, from a cause of action heard by the court without jury, urges error in a final judgment for the defendant [18]*18employer in the employee’s action for damages under the employment contract. The principal question raised in this court concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decision of the trier of fact. We affirm upon a holding that the employee’s actions prior to discharge were such that his discharge was reasonably made for good cause. See Haiman v. Gundersheimer, 130 Fla. 109, 177 So. 199 (1937), and Jimarye, Inc. v. Pipkin, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 669.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschfield-v-topp-electronics-inc-fladistctapp-1975.