Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.

315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1975·No. No. 74-1307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a cause of action heard by the court without jury, urges error in a final judgment for the defendant [18] employer in the employee’s action for damages under the employment contract. The principal question raised in this court concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decision of the trier of fact. We affirm upon a holding that the employee’s actions prior to discharge were such that his discharge was reasonably made for good cause. See Haiman v. Gundersheimer, 130 Fla. 109, 177 So. 199 (1937), and Jimarye, Inc. v. Pipkin, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 669.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a cause of action heard by the court without jury, urges error in a final judgment for the defendant [18] employer in the employee’s action for damages under the employment contract. The principal question raised in this court concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decision of the trier of fact. We affirm upon a holding that the employee’s actions prior to discharge were such that his discharge was reasonably made for good cause. See Haiman v. Gundersheimer, 130 Fla. 109, 177 So. 199 (1937), and Jimarye, Inc. v. Pipkin, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 669.

Affirmed.

Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc., 315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

315 So. 2d 17 (Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related