Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.

315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1975
DocketNo. 74-1307
StatusPublished

This text of 315 So. 2d 17 (Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirschfield v. Topp Electronics, Inc., 315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a cause of action heard by the court without jury, urges error in a final judgment for the defendant [18]*18employer in the employee’s action for damages under the employment contract. The principal question raised in this court concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decision of the trier of fact. We affirm upon a holding that the employee’s actions prior to discharge were such that his discharge was reasonably made for good cause. See Haiman v. Gundersheimer, 130 Fla. 109, 177 So. 199 (1937), and Jimarye, Inc. v. Pipkin, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 669.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jimarye, Inc. v. Pipkin
181 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Haiman v. Gundersheimer
177 So. 199 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 So. 2d 17, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschfield-v-topp-electronics-inc-fladistctapp-1975.