Hirschfield v. Ralston
272 A.D.2d 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 1947
StatusPublished
This text of 272 A.D.2d 927 (Hirschfield v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hirschfield v. Ralston, 272 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).
Opinion
Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action for insufficiency, to strike out various allegations contained in both causes of action in the amended complaint, and to sever the action, affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Holán and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschfield-v-ralston-nyappdiv-1947.