Hirschfeld v. Stahl

194 A.D.2d 388, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 194 A.D.2d 388 (Hirschfeld v. Stahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirschfeld v. Stahl, 194 A.D.2d 388, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered March 12, 1993, which, insofar as is pertinent to the appeal as limited by appellant’s reply brief, granted plaintiffs motion to disqualify the law firm of Shea & Gould as attorneys for defendant-appellant, with related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Disqualification of counsel rests in the sound discretion of the court, and here there has been no showing of abuse (see, Schmidt v Magnetic Head Corp., 101 AD2d 268, 277). It cannot be said that the past matters and the instant matter are "completely unrelated” (Macro Cash & Carry Corp. v Berkman, 81 AD2d 783, 784). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Decana Inc. v. Contogouris
27 A.D.3d 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Avalon L. L. C. v. Coronet Properties Co.
248 A.D.2d 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Neighborhood Supermarket Chain, Inc. v. Epic Security Corp.
162 Misc. 2d 218 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 A.D.2d 388, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschfeld-v-stahl-nyappdiv-1993.