Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld

291 A.D.2d 286, 737 N.Y.S.2d 292, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1763

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 2002·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about December 27, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, determined that plaintiff has a one percent interest in the subject partnership, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having reviewed the evidence that formed the basis for the memorandum order, in which the trial court expressly resolved questions of credibility, we find that such evidence, fairly interpreted, permitted the trial court’s conclusion as to plaintiffs ownership interest in the subject partnership (see, e.g., Haymes v Haymes, 252 AD2d 438).

[287]*287We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about December 27, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, determined that plaintiff has a one percent interest in the subject partnership, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having reviewed the evidence that formed the basis for the memorandum order, in which the trial court expressly resolved questions of credibility, we find that such evidence, fairly interpreted, permitted the trial court’s conclusion as to plaintiffs ownership interest in the subject partnership (see, e.g., Haymes v Haymes, 252 AD2d 438).

[287]*287We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld, 291 A.D.2d 286, 737 N.Y.S.2d 292, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

291 A.D.2d 286 (Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related