Hirschfeld v. Czaja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirschfeld v. Czaja

8 A.D.3d 124, 778 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 124 (Hirschfeld v. Czaja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirschfeld v. Czaja, 8 A.D.3d 124, 778 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered February 5, 2003, which denied defendant Abraham Hirschfeld’s motion to amend his answer to assert six additional cross claims, unanimously dismissed, with one bill of costs in favor of defendants, payable by plaintiff.

[125]*125Notwithstanding the dispute over who should manage the partnership, plaintiff is not a party aggrieved by the denial of defendant Hirschfeld’s motion to amend his answer. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered February 5, 2003, which denied defendant Abraham Hirschfeld’s motion to amend his answer to assert six additional cross claims, unanimously dismissed, with one bill of costs in favor of defendants, payable by plaintiff.

[125]*125Notwithstanding the dispute over who should manage the partnership, plaintiff is not a party aggrieved by the denial of defendant Hirschfeld’s motion to amend his answer. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 124, 778 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschfeld-v-czaja-nyappdiv-2004.