Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828
This text of 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828 (Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co., 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided, unfavorably to them, in Seebach v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. argued this term.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschberger-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.