Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828
Opinion
The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided, unfavorably to them, in Seebach v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. argued this term.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co., 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828 (Hirschberger v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.