Hirschberg v. Flusser
105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 515, 7 Gummere 515, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 285
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner. JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hirschberg v. Flusser, 105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 515, 7 Gummere 515, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1918).
105 A. 893 (Hirschberg v. Flusser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Leontarakis
904 A.2d 846 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)