Hirschberg v. Flusser
105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 515, 7 Gummere 515, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 285
This text of 105 A. 893 (Hirschberg v. Flusser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hirschberg v. Flusser, 105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 515, 7 Gummere 515, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1918).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner. JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Leontarakis
904 A.2d 846 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 515, 7 Gummere 515, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirschberg-v-flusser-nj-1918.