Hirschberg Schutz & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hirschberg Schutz & Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 431, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 337

United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1952·No. No. 56497; protests 167814-K (B) and 167814-K (C) (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.

Hirschberg Schutz & Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 431, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 337 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

28 Cust. Ct. 431 (Hirschberg Schutz & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.