Hirsch v. Teitelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirsch v. Teitelbaum

208 A.D.2d 593, 618 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 593 (Hirsch v. Teitelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirsch v. Teitelbaum, 208 A.D.2d 593, 618 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated March 14, 1994, as, upon in effect reargument, denied their motion for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated March 14, 1994, as, upon in effect reargument, denied their motion for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 593, 618 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-teitelbaum-nyappdiv-1994.