Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.

66 Miss. 439
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 66 Miss. 439 (Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co., 66 Miss. 439 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Arnold, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The notice filed by appellant, to show that she was not a part:ner of the firm sued, was without authority of law, and presented no issue. The partnership could be denied only by special plea, verified by oath. Code, § 1633.

But if there was no mutual misunderstanding in regard to trying •that issue without formal pleading on the part of appellant, the record shows that the notice referred to was treated by appellees as a plea, or in such manner, perhaps, as to mislead appellant, and she should, in order to bring the controversy between the parties fairly to ■trial, have been allowed to file a plea, denying the partnership under •oath, as she sought to do. This'would have been in accordance ■with the spirit of § 1581 of the code.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deaton, Inc. v. Blakeney
349 So. 2d 542 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1977)
Creech v. Runnels
48 So. 2d 869 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
Crosby v. Keen
28 So. 2d 322 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
Wilkinson v. Goza
145 So. 91 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Miss. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-shafer-schwartz-co-miss-1889.