Hirsch v. Schwartz & Cohn, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hirsch v. Schwartz & Cohn, Inc.

230 A.D. 709

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 709 (Hirsch v. Schwartz & Cohn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hirsch v. Schwartz & Cohn, Inc., 230 A.D. 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs in favor of plaintiff as against Highway Improvement and Repair Company, Inc., and with costs in favor of defendants Schwartz & Cohn, Inc., and Krolick as against plaintiff. The need for barriers to indicate the side limits of the ramp and the evidence relating thereto presented an issue of fact as to appealing defendant’s negligence. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents upon the ground that there was no proof of negligence on the part of the appealing defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs in favor of plaintiff as against Highway Improvement and Repair Company, Inc., and with costs in favor of defendants Schwartz & Cohn, Inc., and Krolick as against plaintiff. The need for barriers to indicate the side limits of the ramp and the evidence relating thereto presented an issue of fact as to appealing defendant’s negligence. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents upon the ground that there was no proof of negligence on the part of the appealing defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hirsch-v-schwartz-cohn-inc-nyappdiv-1930.